Question

We have an interface with an external system in which we get flat files from them and process those files. At present we run a job a few times a day that checks if the file is at the ftp location and then processes if it exists. I recently read that it is a bad idea to make use of file systems as a message broker which is why I am putting in this question. Can someone clarify if a situation like this one is a right fitment for the use of some other tool and if so which one? Ours is a java based application.

Answer 1

你们应该问的第一个问题是“是否发挥作用?

如果答案是肯定的,那么你就应该对变化视而不见,因为你认为这是一个坏的想法。我的理解是,你可能不满意,但我不会放弃:

<are> 您可以处理的潜在问题,如未经您了解而被删除的档案,或试图处理仅得到半转让的档案(尽管有办法缓解这两种情况,例如前一种案件的许可,或使用发送的文档或对后一种情况进行内容检查)。

我自己喜欢电文查询系统,例如IBM s MQ或JMS(因为这个系统是它们重新建立起来的,而且实际上使生活变得更差),但按照上面第二段,只有以下两种情况:

problems appear or become evident with the current solution; or
you have some spare time and money lying around for unnecessary rework.

最后一颗子弹需要扩大。虽然这项工作可能没有必要(在解决不存在的问题方面),但并不一定使这项工作毫无用处,特别是如果能够改善业绩或安全,或减少维修工作。

Answer 2

我将利用一个数据库协调你的档案。拥有一个数据库,标明档案地点。只有在档案全部移交时才进入数据库。这将确保你收集已完成的档案。如果出现新条目,而不是投票记录系统,你就可以对数据库进行投票调查。为投票机制建立一个非常简便的机制。如果在文件夹上出现新文件时你会被告知,那么你需要填写一份电文。

友情链接