因此,Im试图在铁路上部署我的JRuby,与Tomcat 7。 一切产品都进行罚款。

在我使用Tomcat同步部署特征之前,这要求背景/战名采用<代码>编号#VERSION.war。

JRuby chokes是我第一次试图在这条道路上要求一个附有<条码>#的档案,其次为:

org.jruby.rack.RackInitializationException: no !/ in spec
    from file:/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.23/webapps/my-application##0001/WEB-INF/lib/jruby-rack-1.1.2.jar!/vendor/rack.rb:7:in `(root) 
    from org/jruby/RubyKernel.java:1038:in `require 
    from file:/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.23/webapps/my-application##0001/WEB-INF/lib/jruby-rack-1.1.2.jar!/vendor/rack.rb:28:in `boot! 
    from file:/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.23/webapps/my-application##0001/WEB-INF/lib/jruby-rack-1.1.2.jar!/jruby/rack/boot/rack.rb:10:in `Rack 
    from file:/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.23/webapps/my-application##0001/WEB-INF/lib/jruby-rack-1.1.2.jar!/jruby/rack/boot/rack.rb:8:in `(root) 
    from org/jruby/RubyKernel.java:1063:in `load 
    from file:/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.23/webapps/my-application##0001/WEB-INF/lib/jruby-rack-1.1.2.jar!/jruby/rack/boot/rack.rb:1:in `(root) 

    at org.jruby.rack.DefaultRackApplicationFactory$4.init(DefaultRackApplicationFactory.java:206)
    at org.jruby.rack.DefaultRackApplicationFactory.newErrorApplication(DefaultRackApplicationFactory.java:102)
    at org.jruby.rack.DefaultRackApplicationFactory.getErrorApplication(DefaultRackApplicationFactory.java:66)
    at org.jruby.rack.SharedRackApplicationFactory$1.call(SharedRackApplicationFactory.java:33)
    at org.jruby.rack.AbstractRackDispatcher.process(AbstractRackDispatcher.java:30)
    at org.jruby.rack.AbstractFilter.doFilter(AbstractFilter.java:31)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:243)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:224)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:169)
    at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:472)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:168)
    at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:98)
    at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:928)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)
    at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:407)
    at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:987)
    at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:539)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:298)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)

正如四分五裂的痕迹所示,这似乎正在对需求进行打击。 JRuby不能处理这种形式的道路? 我能否处理这个问题,或者它是否是JRuby和Tocat命名公约之间的根本冲突?

<>>>>>

我对Tomcat说了一个夸张,问题完全到了 j网。 URL parses URL strings:

new URL("jar:file:/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.23/webapps/my-app##001/WEB-INF/lib/jruby-rack-1.1.2.jar!/vendor/rack-1.3.6/rack.rb")

这起打击是一场“马德卢”极端主义。 但:

new URL("jar:file:/opt/apache-tomcat-7.0.23/webapps/my-app/WEB-INF/lib/jruby-rack-1.1.2.jar!/vendor/rack-1.3.6/rack.rb")

除“#001外,在申请国名下,该编码相同,并有效。

These are invoked on line 1145 of org.jruby.runtime.load.LoadService in JRuby, by the way.

因此,这有什么影响? 仅一例,如果给LURL教区带来麻烦,那么它就认为Tomcat公司在显示名字时所使用特性方面作出选择不大。 我不敢肯定JRuby能够轻松地工作。

Thoughts, anyone?

FURTHER UPDATE

如果URL女士逃脱了 has,你可以工作。 页: 1 然而,我认为,这需要在J Ruby本身进行分配。