We have an application that was built using .NET 3.5. There is a situation where it will run on a machine which only has .NET 4.0 installed.
如果在申请组合中存档<代码><支持Runtime>要素没有定义,或定义如下:
<startup>
<supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50727"/>
</startup>
自www.NET 3.5和CLR v2.0.50727以来,申请启动后是否会出现故障?
注一了解,NET 4.0 标本应与NET 3.5相容,网3.5 应用程序should >在4.0中运行。 这不是问题。 我特别询问了<条码>和代号;支持的Runtime>行为。
Adding Hans Passant s comment as it seems a suitable answer.
申请将坠毁。 用4.NET操作,你需要加上另一个支持的Runtime属性,即“4.0”。
I m building a small application and to reduce hosting costs and dependencies, I am planning to store all persistent data to xml files rather than a Sql Server database. In this case, the site ...
I m trying to perform some basic AD User managment tasks in C# using .Net 3.5 I ve got a System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement.UserPrincipal object that contains the user details. I can call ...
Lets say we have this code that runs in the constructor: Dim initVectorBytes As Byte() = System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(initVector) Dim saltValueBytes As Byte() = System.Text.Encoding....
I have a table called ASB and a table called PeopleInvolved. There is a junction table called PeopleInvolved_ASB which simply contains an ASBID and a PeopleInvolvedID column. The columns act as a ...
I m using a DuplexChannelFactory when accessing my WCF service so that my service can use a callBackChannel to communicate back to the client. That s all fine but I get a timeout error when creating ...
Lets say I have to orchestrate a synchronization algorithm in .Net 3.5 SP1 and any of the synchronization primitives listed in the title fit perfectly for the task. From a performance perspective, is ...
So I m in charge to deploy my project on the productive server where some other ASP.NET-Websites are also set up. The problem now is that I wrote my whole project under .NET 3.5 but on the webserver ...
There s a bug/feature in Visual Studio 2010 where you can t create a unit test project with the 2.0 CLR. https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=483891&wa=...