www.un.org/Depts/DGACM/index_spanish.htm http://github.com/neurobin/shc”rel=“nofollow” (如Flavius Anton)。

但你们需要知道,这本书并非都是独立的。 这仍然取决于壳体,即如果该代码是专门为Bash写的,然后用sh子转换,则在该系统上没有安装Bash,就赢得了拖。

Limitations:

1. Size: heavily increased. 23bytes of test script turned into 9.6KB of binary.
2. Speed: It will run slower than the plain Bash script.
3. The size of the Bash script convertible is limited by the _SC_ARG_MAX system configuration parameter.
4. The binary is depended on Bash.
5. It is a code obfuscation which is rendered useless against intelligent attack.

Another way is to use Bash2py:

http://www.swag.uwaterloo.ca/bash2py/"rel=“nofollow”>bash2py 换算 Bash source Code to bash。 不久前,你会发现,这在实际工作中是毫无用处的(<>bash2py<=3.2)。

1. Download and install Bash2py
2. Install cx_freeze (or other tool)
3. write a sample script, test:

   #!/bin/bash
   echo works

4. convert it to python:

   bash2pyengine ./test

5. A test.py python script will be generated. Compile it using tools like cx_freeze:

   cxfreeze ./test.py

6. A binary file with lots of shared object file will be created (dist directory for cx_freeze). You can find a binary (named test) there. Run it from that directory. Note that the shared object files are the dependencies for this binary. You can port this binary as long as you take all the shared object files with it.

Limitations:

1. Size: It is a two way process and in each process size is heavily increased (super heavy), specially in cxfreeze step, as it produces a lot of shared object files and also the binary file alone becomes enormous too. For the above test script, original size is 23bytes, test.py -> 38bytes, test (binary) -> 1.3MB, and total (binary and it s dependencies) -> 6.5MB!!!
2. Speed: I think the Bash code will run way more faster than this.
3. All the limitations of Bash2py and freezing tool (cx_freeze or such) apply.
4. Bash2py is yet to evolve to be usable. You will see a lot of red colored text/entry in Bash2py Manual Page. Red colored text means unsupported in their context. There are lots of loosly supported features too. For example: Array is orange colored (now) which means "not necessarily well supported", actually it s not supported at all (yet bash2py<=3.2). So even the Bash to Python conversion is not well performed where you will have to consider the limitation of the next step (freezing) too.

Finally:

以上两者都没有实际的解决办法。 简言之,Bash2py比shc差,因为它没有支持所有巴什特征(yetbash2py<=3.2)。 i.e 您可以自由书写代码,并期望与Bash2py合作。

在经过所有这些艰苦努力之后,我可以提供帮助,但同意:

It s possible, but you don t want to.

是的。 它是一个名为“shc”的小型项目(Shell Compiler)。 https://github.com/existz/shc-3.8.9“rel=” Github repo

实际援引sh是sh——指挥。 如果该方案正在实施,则可以通过皮条获得源代码。 而且必须是一件好事。 为了解决这些问题,我开发了shellc,该软件是Gite Hub的公开来源,主要是通过类似于的管道方法,将目录输入到隐藏的源名录。 通过增加编码混淆和随机生成有效品位计算功能,增加拆分和反射工程的复杂性。