Question

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.

Closed 6 years ago.

我有兴趣将一些人工测试案例汇集起来,以便核实特定网络应用的《巴塞尔公约》正在按计划运作。

不幸的是,如果我们想使用诸如健身等工具进行自动化测试,那么,德国马克与立陶宛兰岛之间的政变就足够了,我需要花费相当长的时间,而且鉴于目前的最后期限,我并不认为这是一种时间价值支出。

My question is, is it reasonable to perform manual testing (testing would be as defined here) in scenarios as described above, and if so:

How detailed should the system tests be for the BL layer?
In the case of general system tests and smoke tests, will designing each test to cover a particular requirement be sufficient for coverage?

<>>Example:

REQUIREMENT: If a user provides two cost entries for the same type of
       item, the application will take the higher of the two costs, and zero
       the second.
TEST: Add two cost entries, both for vehicle use, submit the ticket. 
      Verify that the invoice for the ticket only shows the higher of the two.

Anything else I should take into consideration when designing manual tests?

Answer 1

该系统如何为BL层进行详细测试?

你们的制度需要多长时间的支持? 在你登船后,任何人都需要再次进行退步测试? 如果是,这些测试必须足够详细,使其能够根据文件进行测试。否则,哪怕是两人均写文章?

有了正确的工具,即使 your和 B子合并,你也可以通过UI自动进行黑箱测试。如果您的制度将存在多年,而退步的代价是巨大的,那么你就应考虑试图通过情报和安全局使检测自动化。可执行的测试案例比书面测试案例文件要贵得多。

In the case of general system tests and smoke tests, will designing each test to cover a particular requirement be sufficient for coverage?

至少,你们还需要进行探索性测试,并试图打破对冲案件的方案,以便在进行人工测试时尽量扩大你的现场视察。测试快乐道路将产生比试图在最边缘情况下打破这条路要小得多的诱惑。

还考虑了要求中的任何遗漏。根据你们的要求的抽象程度,可以忽略很多情况。

Anything else I should take into consideration when designing manual tests?

您可以做些什么来使试验装置的建立自动化,并实行这一系统。即使你不能将这一额外步骤推向自动测试,如果你能够立即安装测试装置,你也可以节省大量时间。

友情链接