English 中文(简体)
直到现在,Z3是否给微小的无法满足的核心?
原标题:Does Z3 give the minimal unsatisfiable core up to now?
  • 时间:2012-05-11 05:52:48
  •  标签:
  • z3

I want to know if Z3 now can give the minimal unsatisfiable core now. Or is there someone has developed a good support for this? Does anybody know this?

非常感谢。

问题回答

Z3生产无法满足的核心,但不是<>/em>则必然是最低限度的。

Here is an example on how to extract unsat cores: http://rise4fun.com/Z3/smtc_core

您也不妨检查下列问题:

缩略语

Label on SMT-LIB 2.0 claims in z3





相关问题
Are Int and Real somehow compatible in SMT-LIB?

The equality operator in SMT-LIB generally requires, unsurprisingly, that its operands be of the same type. For example, this is an error: (set-logic QF_LIRA) (declare-fun a () Bool) (declare-fun b () ...

Z3: Extracting existential model-values

I m playing around with Z3 s QBVF solver, and wondering if it s possible to extract values from an existential assertion. To wit, let s say I have the following: (assert (exists ((x (_ BitVec 16))) (...

Can Z3 be used to reason about substrings?

I am trying to use Z3 to reason about substrings, and have come across some non-intuitive behavior. Z3 returns sat when asked to determine if xy appears within xy , but it returns unknown when ...

Labeling Z3 scopes and popping back to a specific one

Is it possible to label Z3 scopes (SMTLib2 syntax) and to then pop back to a specific one? For example: (push foo) ; ... (push) ; ... (pop foo) ; pops two scopes I know that I can pop two scopes ...

Has anyone tried proving Z3 with Z3 itself?

Has anyone tried proving Z3 with Z3 itself? Is it even possible, to prove that Z3 is correct, using Z3? More theoretical, is it possible to prove that tool X is correct, using X itself?

Which statistics indicate an efficient run of Z3?

The SMTLib2 directive (get-info all-statistics) displays several numbers, e.g. num. conflicts: 4 num. propagations: 0 (binary: 0) num. qa. inst: 23 In order to test different ...

Mismatched DLL versions?

I am trying to use the Z3 SMT solver for my projects. However it seems there is a mismatch of the Visual Studio versions, which caused my troubles. My Visual Studio 2008 reports that The ...