I want to know if Z3 now can give the minimal unsatisfiable core now. Or is there someone has developed a good support for this? Does anybody know this?
非常感谢。
I want to know if Z3 now can give the minimal unsatisfiable core now. Or is there someone has developed a good support for this? Does anybody know this?
非常感谢。
Z3生产无法满足的核心,但不是<>/em>则必然是最低限度的。
Here is an example on how to extract unsat cores: http://rise4fun.com/Z3/smtc_core
您也不妨检查下列问题:
The equality operator in SMT-LIB generally requires, unsurprisingly, that its operands be of the same type. For example, this is an error: (set-logic QF_LIRA) (declare-fun a () Bool) (declare-fun b () ...
I m playing around with Z3 s QBVF solver, and wondering if it s possible to extract values from an existential assertion. To wit, let s say I have the following: (assert (exists ((x (_ BitVec 16))) (...
I am trying to use Z3 to reason about substrings, and have come across some non-intuitive behavior. Z3 returns sat when asked to determine if xy appears within xy , but it returns unknown when ...
Is it possible to label Z3 scopes (SMTLib2 syntax) and to then pop back to a specific one? For example: (push foo) ; ... (push) ; ... (pop foo) ; pops two scopes I know that I can pop two scopes ...
I m using the following rule in my Z3 program to make s the only possible value of sort S. (assert (forall ((t S)) (= t s))) However, the above formula makes Z3 report the following error: Z3: ...
Has anyone tried proving Z3 with Z3 itself? Is it even possible, to prove that Z3 is correct, using Z3? More theoretical, is it possible to prove that tool X is correct, using X itself?
The SMTLib2 directive (get-info all-statistics) displays several numbers, e.g. num. conflicts: 4 num. propagations: 0 (binary: 0) num. qa. inst: 23 In order to test different ...
I am trying to use the Z3 SMT solver for my projects. However it seems there is a mismatch of the Visual Studio versions, which caused my troubles. My Visual Studio 2008 reports that The ...