Question

I want to revisit an old question of mine about in-memory "compilation" of classes. Since about 1/2 a year have passed since I asked (and was somewhat answered), I d like to re-raise the issue and see if something new would come up (so no, I don t consider this a duplicate).

The old question can be found here: On-the-fly, in-memory java code compilation for Java 5 and Java 6 - I suggest reading it (and the answers) before answering this question.

I m quite content with beanshell doing the heavy work of evaluating string of a java class to an actual Class object. However, beanshell has been standing on version 2.0b4 for ages now and its limitations (no constructor, not even default; no generics, no for-each, no enums...) are annoying.

Reminder - this is to be used as a debugging interface, so performance considerations are negligible. However, I can t have server restarts, can t send class files to the location and JSPs are a very bad choice for me (I won t go into reasons here). Also, the end product must be a Class (or an Object of that class) so I could pass it around.

Some limitations: I can t have a JDK, so no javax.tools.JavaCompiler. I can t have JSPs since I don t have tomcat or other "real" web container. Java 5 syntax support would be great, especially generics, enums and parameterization. Support for default constructors would be very nice.

Any ideas?

Edit 1: I just found out that there is a round-about way of having constructors in beanshell - however you have to declare them "public void XXX(){...}" instead of the usual way "public XXX(){...}".

Answer 1

I ended up using Bean Shell. It s not perfect, but it solved 99% of the issue.

Answer 2

If you can t bundle the SUN JDK tools.jar due to licensing reasons, perhaps you could include the Eclipse JDT Core compiler instead, see

http://help.eclipse.org/galileo/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.jdt.doc.isv/guide/jdt_api_compile.htm

This is e.g. what the Jetty web server s JSP implementation does.

Answer 3

Can t you just copy over to tools.jar and get the javax.tools.JavaCompiler and add it to the classpath? Or is it a licensing issue.

This code, and tools.jar on the classpath, seems to work:

import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Arrays;
import javax.tools.JavaCompiler;
import javax.tools.JavaFileObject;
import javax.tools.StandardJavaFileManager;
import javax.tools.ToolProvider;


public class Main
{
    public static void main(final String[] argv)
        throws IOException
    {
        final File[]                             files;
        final JavaCompiler                       compiler;
        final StandardJavaFileManager            fileManager;
        final Iterable<? extends JavaFileObject> compilationUnits;

        files = new File[]
        {
            new File(argv[0]),
        };        
        compiler         = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler();
        fileManager      = compiler.getStandardFileManager(null, null, null);
        compilationUnits = fileManager.getJavaFileObjectsFromFiles(Arrays.asList(files));

        compiler.getTask(null, fileManager, null, null, null, compilationUnits).call();
        fileManager.close();
    }
}

Answer 4

I remember reading about the Bytecode Engineering Library (BCEL) a long time ago, back when Java 1.4 was all the rage. See http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel/index.html. I never used it, so I only mention it because it seems close to what you are asking about (and it works, or at least worked, with older VMs) and I didn t see anybody mention it yet.

Answer 5

Is there a specific reason why it has to be a Java string that produces the class/object? My spontaneous reaction is that JRuby is what you re looking for - it seems to be a very solid platform, and Ruby has a strong tradition of meta-programming.

友情链接