Vincent, Gishu and Jerry hinted that you need to check if the item is already in the result list before appending to it, while Derek hinted that you could modify the original list when you see that an item is repeated.
Read the documentation of the functions adjoin
and remove
here:
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/f_adjoin.htm
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/f_rm_rm.htm
The HyperSpec is a very useful reference, add it your bookmarks.
Those two functions do not modify their arguments, but instead return the result as a new list. There are other functions that DO modify their arguments and thus might be more efficient, but at this point perhaps you shouldn t worry about them.
OK, I hope that by the time I have written this you have figured it out. If not, keep trying, that s the only way you ll really learn.
Now I d like to talk to you about another approach, and that is about carrying the result through the recursive calls.
Our function repeated
will do nothing but call a helper function repeatedr
which will do the actual work, passing to it an initial empty result ()
:
(defun repeated (lst)
(repeatedr lst ()))
Now let s define the helper function, it receives two parameters: the list to search for duplicates, and the result list where we will accumulate the duplicate items.
(defun repeatedr (lst result)
(if (null lst)
result
(if (member (first lst) (rest lst))
(repeatedr (rest lst) (adjoin (first lst) result))
(repeatedr (rest lst) result))))
When the condition (member (first lst) (rest lst))
holds true we will adjoin the first item to the result
, and the result of that adjoining will be passed to the recursive call as the second parameter; otherwise we just pass the result
as is to the recursive call.
When the list is finally empty (if (null lst)
we will return the result
.
> (repeated (a a b a b c))
(B A)
Notice that the result is (B A)
and maybe you were expecting it to be (A B)
. Try to follow the execution of the recursive calls and the values of the parameters at each call with pen and paper, that will be a good exercise, and you ll have to play with adjoin
to understand its behaviour. If you want to get the result reversed you can modify the function like this:
(defun repeatedr (lst result)
(if (null lst)
(reverse result)
(if (member (first lst) (rest lst))
(repeatedr (rest lst) (adjoin (first lst) result))
(repeatedr (rest lst) result))))
This reverses the result when the recursion finishes.
Now, what about the suggestion of removing the duplicate elements from the list before going forward? We could have written our function like this:
(defun repeatedr (lst result)
(if (null lst)
result
(if (member (first lst) (rest lst))
(repeatedr (remove (first lst) lst) (cons (first lst) result))
(repeatedr (rest lst) result))))
Try to play with remove
at the REPL:
> (remove a (a b c d a e f b a d))
(B C D E F B D)
Notice that we are no longer adjoining to the result, instead we just create a new "cons cell" with (cons (first lst) result)
. cons
and adjoin
do the same thing, except that adjoin will add the value only if it is not already present in the list.
Hope this gives you something to play with.