Question

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.

Closed 10 years ago.

我们在我们的CMS产品中使用CkEditor，并不想使用spellchecker.net的内置拼写检查工具。有没有人知道其他插件，比如旧的FCKeditor插件，它使用aspell服务器端？

Answer 1

这里提供了一个基于aspell的FCKeditor旧插件的CkEditor端口：

将此翻译成中文：http://cksource.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=15893 http://cksource.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=15893

Answer 2

玛丽安娜：

First of all, the reason why we want to use spellchecker.net has nothing to to with the functionality itself, both the SCAYT and the regular spell check is working great. However, we are using CkEditor in our CMS (CorePublish, www.coretrek.no), and using an online tool like spellchecker.net has some drawbacks:

The free online version is at times slow, and it displays ads, both of which many of our customers will find annoying.
Our product is sometimes installed at intranets and closed networks where internet access is not available, this means depending on an online service is a no-go.
We had a working spellchecker included in our previous version (using FCKEditor) for free. Suddenly requiring our customers (or our self) to pay extra for spellchecking, purchasing either the hosted or licensed versions, is not something we want to do.
We want to integrate the spell check itself with our own back end, where we e.g. store a custom dictionary for each user etc.

因此,根据这些问题,我们决定改用“旧的”火ell,使我们能够提供一栋建筑,以防 default,并控制我们的自我。

问候，

Arve Skjørestad 阿尔韦·斯克约雷斯塔德

高级系统开发商

核心远足有限公司

Answer 3

jQuery拼写检查器与CKEditor集成得非常好：http://jquery-spellchecker.badsyntax.co/ckeditor.html

友情链接