我拥有WPF用户控制,即MVVER。 用户控制(包含清单调查)需要网页上的数据(包括该网页)。 我必须把财产设于。 在后面浏览代码,以获取这一数据投入。 这将符合MVVER(But MVVM patterns不支持根据一所知在法典中添加行文。 如果不是的话,那也是什么方法?
You want to do this via data binding. The controls are bound to properties in your viewmodel which receives the data, applies the needed logic and gives it back to the view for displaying it. Have a look here to get an idea on how all that works.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/wpf/thread/a3eedc3e-0d59-420c-aba0-44fe8b00552f'rel=“nofollow noreferer”http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/wpf/thread/a3eed3e-0d59-420caba0-44fe8b00552f。
但是,我并不真正了解注射的含义(如下文所述):
an interface to the UserControl public model called IUserControlModel. It has the properties that should be visible from outside; - a UserControlViewModel that contains a public property of type IUserControlModel that is injected in the constructor; plus all the properties used for XAML binds specific to the usercontrol implementation; XAML may have binds directly to the IUserControlModel properties too; - a MainWindowViewModel that nests the IUserControlModel inside.
I think your problem can be solved in easier way. If you expose ItemsSource property of ListView as Dependency Property of your user control you can achieve what you want without unnecesary (in this case) overhead of implementing MVVM pattern : You then can just use databinding to add data from the page where the user control is included.
post that I think answers your question : Post link
Every time I read about the "inline" declaration in C it is mentioned that it is only a hint to the compiler (i.e. it does not have to obey it). Is there any benefit to adding it then, or should I ...
I wonder if there s a way to define a class in such a way that instances of it will never be members of another class (only local variables), or the other way round - only members but never local. Is ...
I am a newbie to C++/CLI. What is the equivalent of the following C# code in managed C++/CLI for both the header and source file? public static bool ArrayEquals<T>(T[] a, T[] b) { return ...
So, I ve seen how useful namespaces can be to organize declarations into their respective groups, but now comes an issue with this. The difference between making a library in C and a library in C++ ...
Why do functions need to be prior declared in C ?
I ve got following code: File: Foo.h class Foo { friend void Bar(); }; File: Foo.cpp void Bar() {}; File Test.cpp #include "Foo.h" int main(void) { Bar(); return 0; } VS2008 ...
I m sure this has been asked before but I can t find it. The PHP documentation unclear on this and I can t find any examples like this. Is it legal to use variables in the declaration of an array ...
For example is this correct: class C { private: C(); C(const & C other); } or you should rather provide definition(s): class C { private: C() {}; C(const & C ...
