Question

我正在使用 Apple果工具“地点”工具,并且注意到,在我回头提出两种观点时,分配总是在增加。在调查中,我发现,所有记忆都来自我方言中方言。

我接受检查,我的《国际调查评论》正在处理中,但看来《国际调查意见》不是吗? I m 不再保留统一意见书控制员的意见。没有人有什么想法?

我在此写道,要改变观点。

UISubViewController *viewController = [UIViewControllerFactory createViewController:viewControllerID];     // Creates and returns a UIViewController by ID

[currentViewController viewWillDisappear:YES];
[currentViewController.view removeFromSuperview];
[currentViewController viewDidDisappear:YES];

[viewController viewWillAppear:YES];
[self.view insertSubview:viewController.view atIndex:0];
[viewController viewDidAppear:YES];

self.currentViewController = viewController;
[viewController release];

Edit:
Ok, because there was concern that I was just using a ViewController s View and then releasing the ViewController, I tried an experiment where I made a new class that is the File s Owner in the NIB, but inherits from NSObject.

该法典现在看着这一点:

MyView *myView = [[MyView alloc] initWithNibName:@"myView"];

[currentView viewWillDisappear:YES];
[currentView.view removeFromSuperview];
[currentView viewDidDisappear:YES];

[myView viewWillAppear:YES];
[self.view insertSubview:myView.view atIndex:0];
[myView viewDidAppear:YES];

self.currentView = myView;
[myView release];

我的初衷是:

@interface MyView : NSObject {
    IBOutlet UIView *view;
    NSArray *nibTopLevelObjects;
}

@property (nonatomic, retain) UIView *view;

- (id)initWithNibName:(NSString *)nibName;

@end


@implementation MyView

@synthesize view;

- (id)initWithNibName:(NSString *)nibName {
    if (self = [super init]) {

        nibTopLevelObjects = [[NSBundle mainBundle] loadNibNamed:nibName owner:self options:nil];
        [nibTopLevelObjects retain];
    }
    return self;
}

- (void)dealloc {
    [view release];
    [nibTopLevelObjects release];

    view = nil;
    nibTopLevelObjects = nil;

    [super dealloc];
}

@end

我仍然看到,我每次交换和发表新看法时,都发现了对观点的记忆泄露。

任何新想法?

Answer 1

Your factory returns a viewController but you are only adding a view, not pushing a new controller. Why not just create a view in this case?

你们正在做的是,在不释放他们的情况下,不断推翻了自己。你也许可以发表这一看法的控制者所持有的观点,但毕竟如此。

现任书记官

@property (nonatomic, retain) UISubViewController* currentViewController;

或许? 如果是这样的话,那就保留了一条与释放相对应的 is子,那么你就永远不会释放自己。如果您不使用<代码>本身,则即使对财产作了如此界定,也不会保留。

Answer 2

你正确地删除了旧观点,并增加了新的观点。这意味着,在您的《分意见》中,要么在其他地方,你错误地保留了观点,要么在模拟器中重新测试,而不是测试装置。

您能把《子号》交给一位子书记员,看看那里发生什么情况?

当你测试真实装置时,你是否取得了同样的结果?

PS Adam Eberbach提出了一个公平的观点,这就是为什么你只是为了偷窃观点而制造一种观点控制器,然后将其释放?

友情链接