I have the link below on a razor page:
@Html.ActionLink("Create New Profile", "Create", "Profile", new { @class="toplink" })
It appears in thes source of view page as shown below:
<a href="/admin/profile/create?length=7" class="toplink">Create New Profile</a>
When I click on the link the URL is like this:
http://localhost:54876/admin/profile/create?length=7
I don t want ?length=7. Why is this auto generated?
The ActionLink override you are using matches to the (string linkText, string actionName, Object routeValues, Object htmlAttributes) override. So your "Profile" value is being passed to the routeValues parameter. The behavior of this function with respect to this parameter is to take all public properties on it and add it to the list of route values used to generate the link. Since a String only has one public property (Length) you end up with "length=7".
The correct overload you want to use is the (string linkText, string actionName, string controllerName, Object routeValues, Object htmlAttributes) and you call it loke so:
@Html.ActionLink("Create New Profile", "Create", "Profile", new {}, new { @class="toplink"})
I m not sure the exact cause of this, but change it to:
@Html.ActionLink("Create New Profile", "Create", "Profile", new {}, new { @class="toplink" })
I don t know which overload MVC is picking when you leave off the last parameter (htmlattributes is the added one), but that will fix it. One of these days I ll investigate and figure out exactly what s going on.
Another thing to note, since you are defining the controller in the @ActionLink, which you may not need to do, for example, the view that your "Create New Profile" @ActionLink is expressed in might be "/admin/profile/index.cshtml", a view that lists existing profiles, in this case, you do not need to define the controller in the @ActionLink as the @ActionLink is already relative to the ProfileController, so your @ActionLink could be
@Html.ActionLink("Create New Profile", "Create", null, new { @class="toplink" })
I used null instead of new{} as the marked answer does, I think this is more appropriate myself. ActionLink overloads are not the most straightforward thing ever.
I am trying to make a WebForms project and ASP.NET MVC per this question. One of the things I ve done to make that happen is that I added a namespaces node to the WebForms web.config: <pages ...
I m using ASP.NET MVC and Entity Framework. I m going to pass a complex entity to the client side and allow the user to modify it, and post it back to the controller. But I don t know how to do that ...
What I want to reach is a way to add a script and style placeholder in my master. They will include my initial site.css and jquery.js files. Each haml page or partial can then add their own required ...
let s say we have something like this public class Person { public string Name {get; set;} public Country Country {get; set;} } public class PersonViewModel { public Person Person {get; ...
I started out this morning working with my ASP.NET MVC project like normal and everything worked. I added a new class and some functions and it still worked. Then, all of a sudden, while I was ...
I have an BLL that does validation on user input then inserts a parent(PorEO) and then inserts children(PorBoxEO). So there are two calls to the same InsertJCDC. One like this=>InsertJCDC(fakePor)...
So, I have an asp.net mvc app that is being worked on by multiple developers in differing capacities. This is our first time working on a mvc app and my first time working with .NET. Our app does not ...
i have the following base controller... public class BaseController : Controller { protected override void Initialize(System.Web.Routing.RequestContext requestContext) { if (...