Question

我认为,标题完全不言而喻,但也许我应该详细提出。 I m Building a WYSIWYG Editor and I m really at thestart of it. 因此,我认识到,也许知道这些利弊会给我带来启迪。从根本上说,我的问题是,因为我希望一个编辑在所有主要浏览器中至少工作90%,我如何在四肢内使用内容,与设计Mode和iframe相比,使用内容是什么样的组合和利弊? 此外,在研究I ve时,发现,该编辑。我认为,它不使用任何这些属性,而是转移了案文的位置。这种做法是否更好? 我知道,有许多因素影响对最后一个问题的答复,但正如我提到的那样,我在编辑中研究的最重要事情是,90%的用户能够使用这一工具。 NB:我不想使用任何第三方图书馆。

Answer 1

For most uses, my preference is still for an iframe with designMode on most browsers and a contenteditable <body> element in IE, which makes it easier to work with. The reasons:

Having the editable content in an iframe effectively sandboxes it and allows you to drop the editor into any page with confidence that the page s CSS and DOM events cannot affect the editable content
designMode is more reliable in Firefox. I ve seen several bugs with contenteditable that don t exist with designMode, which is probably because contenteditable was added to Firefox relatively recently whereas designMode has existed since around 2003.

关于安执委会,其文本处理方法已经过时,具有许多优势,但我怀疑这种做法仅限于单一空间的字体。另外,CodeMirror 2使用相关办法,但同样限于单天线。

Answer 2

www.un.org/Depts/DGACM/index_spanish.htm 在电离层电离层中,没有工作:

<p>
  <img style="float:left" src="foo">
  <p contentEditable="true">very long text here ...
    ... this text won t flow round the image</p>
</p>

This is because contentEditable triggers the infamous hasLayout. Other than that, everything works pretty well.

Answer 3

<设计书>设计书和<编码>contentEditable属性,以及驱动精彩文本编辑的标本,已在所有主要浏览器实施,包括航天新一代人、歌星、谷歌 Chrome和当然是因特网探索者。

Mark Finkle写道:“http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/xul-cfallings-midas-rich-text-editor/“rel=“nofollow”>设计高级摘要:Mode ,后加。

友情链接