Question

我的物体有<条码>BackgroundWorker(即行动代表的地址)。 i. 即单一生产者单一消费模式。

在收集单一生产商时,我希望将一项终止行动安排到<代码>BackgroundWorker 深处。

这几乎是容易的——使用最后审定人——但打破了“放之机”规则中的管理资源。

因此,如果我不再工作,我如何确保read子完全终止?

答案一:

IDisposable: This would require a massive breaking change to the base class, but I accept it is perhaps required (this always seems to be a problem with the IDisposable pattern..)
ThreadPool: These are long running actions that must be run in order. So I would consider a dedicated thread to be the logical choice.
WeakReference: I just thought of this one. Perhaps it is the correct way to do this (?). Basically the Thread keeps a WeakReference back to the owning object, and periodically wakes itself to check if that WeakReference is still alive, when it dies it enqueues a Terminate. Not exactly elegant - I don t like the "periodically wakes itself" bit - but is this the best solution?

Answer 1

<代码>可支配或类似于对我的最佳方法的类似声音——在你完成生产时明确说,而不是诱发垃圾收集。

从根本上说,它像问题一样,使工人的read子消失了,这表明你已经完成了生产。我确实理解,在某些局势中,这可能是骗局的,但如果在all上,如果你能够明确地这样做,就会使你的生活更加可预测。