SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) and REST (Representation State Transfer/strong>) both are better in their way. 因此,我并没有对这些建议进行比较。 相反,我正试图描述情况,当时我更喜欢使用教育、科学和技术部,以及何时使用社会、文化权利委员会。
www.un.org/Depts/DGACM/index_spanish.htm 有效载荷是什么?
在通过互联网发送数据时,每个单位发送的信息包括头盔和发送的实际数据。 负责人确定了包装的源头和目的地,而实际数据则称为有效载荷。 一般而言,有效载荷是代表申请传送的数据和目的地系统收到的数据。
Now, f或example, I have to send a Telegram and we all know that the cost of the telegram will depend on some words.
www.un.org/Depts/DGACM/index_spanish.htm 因此,在下文中我提到这两条信息,其中一条是更廉价的发送?
<name>Arin</name>
或
"name": "Arin"
我知道你的回答是第二点,尽管这两点代表了同一个信息,第二点是成本更低的。
So I am trying to say that, sending data over the network in JSON format is cheaper than sending it in XML format regarding payload.
Here is the first benefit 或advantages of REST over SOAP. SOAP only support XML, but REST supports different format like text, JSON, XML, etc. And we already know, if we use Json then definitely we will be in better place regarding payload.
Now, SOAP supports the only XML, but it also has its advantages.
<>Really! 如何?
SOAP relies on XML in three ways
Envelope – that defines what is in the message and how to process it.
A set of encoding rules f或data types, and finally the layout of the procedure calls and responses gathered.
该信封是通过运输(HTTP/HTTPS)发送的,而RPC(Remote Procedure Call)则执行,信封以XML格式文件的形式归还。
重要的一点是,SOAP的优点之一是使用“generic” transport,但REST使用HTTP/HTTPS。 环保署可以几乎使用任何运输方式发出这一请求,但教育、科学和技术部不能这样做。 因此,我们在此利用《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》。
正如我在上面第段中已经提到的那样,“REST”使用“HTTP/HTTPS”,这样的话就更深了。
当我们谈论远洋班轮运输技术时,采用的所有安全措施都是继承的,这被称为transport level security,而且只有t 即电线上<>,但当你在另一边投放电时,你不知道要走多少个阶段才能达到处理数据的真实点。 当然,所有这些阶段都可以使用不同于吉大港山区。 因此,休息并非完全安全?
But SOAP supports SSL just like REST additionally it also supports WS-Security which adds some enterprise security features. WS-Security offers protection from the creation of the message to it’s consumption. So f或transport level security whatever loophole we found that can be prevented using WS-Security.
Apart from that, as REST is limited by it s HTTP protocol so it’s transaction support is neither ACID compliant n或can provide two-phase commit across distributed transnational resources.
But SOAP has comprehensive support f或both ACID based transaction management f或short-lived transactions and compensation based transaction management f或long-running transactions. It also supports two-phase commit across distributed resources.
我没有得出任何结论,但我更喜欢以《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》为基础的网络服务,而安全、交易等是主要关切。
Here is the "The Java EE 6 Tutorial" where they have said A RESTful design may be appropriate when the following conditions are met. Have a look.
http://www.un.org/Depts/DGACM/index_french.htm
