For example, I have a type:
type abc = a | b | c ;
如何在汇编时间时形成包含工会所有要素的图形?
type t = [ a , b , c ];
For example, I have a type:
type abc = a | b | c ;
如何在汇编时间时形成包含工会所有要素的图形?
type t = [ a , b , c ];
很容易从图形型转换为工会型;例如,见。 反之,从工会转变为教导,就是其中之一。 Truly Bad Visions, 你应努力这样做。 (见microsoft/Type#13298供讨论和坦率回答) 让我们首先去做,然后::
// oh boy don t do this
type UnionToIntersection<U> =
(U extends any ? (k: U) => void : never) extends ((k: infer I) => void) ? I : never
type LastOf<T> =
UnionToIntersection<T extends any ? () => T : never> extends () => (infer R) ? R : never
// TS4.0+
type Push<T extends any[], V> = [...T, V];
// TS4.1+
type TuplifyUnion<T, L = LastOf<T>, N = [T] extends [never] ? true : false> =
true extends N ? [] : Push<TuplifyUnion<Exclude<T, L>>, L>
type abc = a | b | c ;
type t = TuplifyUnion<abc>; // ["a", "b", "c"]
这种工作,但我确实建议不将其用于任何官方目的或任何生产法。 因此:
www.un.org/Depts/DGACM/index_spanish.htm 您可以依靠工会的指令。 该汇编载有汇编者的执行细节;由于X ± > Y>>/code>相当于
Y>X<>>/code>,汇编者认为可以相互改动。 有时是:
type TypeTrue1A = TuplifyUnion<true | 1 | "a">; // [true, 1, "a"] ?
type Type1ATrue = TuplifyUnion<1 | "a" | true>; // [true, 1, "a"]!! ?
因此,维持秩序确实没有任何办法。 并且请不假设产出至少总是<代码>[真实性,1,“a”;没有保证。 它载有执行细节,因此,具体产出可以从一个版本的版本改为下一个版本,或从贵国法典的汇编到下一个版本。 在某些情形下,实际上确实发生这种情况:例如,编造者caches/em>结合;似乎无关联的法典可能会影响将工会命令带入海滩,从而形成秩序。 命令并不简单可靠。
编辑者认为工会是工会,当工会倒塌或扩张时,你可能不高兴。 <代码>a> > > > > > > > 仅向< 编码> > <<> > > > 和< 编码> boolean 实际<>expand<<>em> > 至>false ±/code>:
type TypeAString = TuplifyUnion<"a" | string>; // [string]
type TypeBoolean = TuplifyUnion<boolean>; // [false, true]
因此,如果你计划保留一些现有要素,那么你就应当停止规划。 如果没有失去这种信息,就没有一般办法让工会和工会返回。
没有经过普通工会的支持。 使用所有虐待手段的频率为Im,conditional category。 第一版:
因此,你走了。 你可以做些什么,但却没有这样做。 (如果你
我有时会遇到这样一种情况,即我想从A类中得出B类,但发现,要么服贸总协定不支持,要么在守则中进行变革,但难以遵循。 有时,从A中选择B是任意的,我也可以从另一个方向获得。 在这里,如果你能够从你的指导开始,你可以很容易地找到一种涵盖图人作为要素接受的所有价值观的类型:
type X = ["a", "b", "c"];
type AnyElementOf<T extends any[]> = T[number];
type AnyElementOfX = AnyElementOf<X>;
如果你检查<代码>AnyElementOfX/code>的扩大情况,请查阅a">> >a" >> > > >> > >>。
Taking jcalz
之所以做这项工作,是因为在型号中, 现在,由于汇编者的行为,我们不能够预测地订购<编码>>升级 Admittedly, still imperfect since we can t guarantee that every member is a unique member of the union. But we are now guaranteeing that the count of all members of the union will be covered by the resulting tuple, predictably and safely.// Most of this is jcalz answer, up until the magic.
type UnionToIntersection<U> =
(U extends any ? (k: U) => void : never) extends ((k: infer I) => void)
? I
: never;
type LastOf<T> =
UnionToIntersection<T extends any ? () => T : never> extends () => infer R
? R
: never;
type Push<T extends any[], V> = [...T, V];
type TuplifyUnion<T, L = LastOf<T>, N = [T] extends [never] ? true : false> =
true extends N
? []
: Push<TuplifyUnion<Exclude<T, L>>, L>;
// The magic happens here!
export type Tuple<T, A extends T[] = []> =
TuplifyUnion<T>[ length ] extends A[ length ]
? [...A]
: Tuple<T, [T, ...A]>;
tuple
只是另一个Array
,我们可以比较阵列的长度。)的工会成员人数的长度。 T
。const numbers: Tuple<2 | 4 | 6> = [4, 6, 2];
// Resolved type: [2 | 4 | 6, 2 | 4 | 6, 2 | 4 | 6]
这种办法需要额外工作,因为从实际教学中得出理想的教学类型。
我同意。 然而,它对相关使用案例仍然有用:Ensure that a tuple includes all of the elements of a Union打字 (例如用于单位检测)。 在这种情形下,你需要宣布阵列anyway,因为打字不能产生从类型上得出的时间值。 因此,“外派”工作变得毫无意义。
注:作为先决条件,Im取决于以下网址:
type FunctionComparisonEqualsWrapped<T> =
T extends (T extends {} ? infer R & {} : infer R)
? { [P in keyof R]: R[P] }
: never;
type FunctionComparisonEquals<A, B> =
(<T>() => T extends FunctionComparisonEqualsWrapped<A> ? 1 : 2) extends
<T>() => T extends FunctionComparisonEqualsWrapped<B> ? 1 : 2
? true
: false;
type IsAny<T> = FunctionComparisonEquals<T, any>;
type InvariantComparisonEqualsWrapped<T> =
{ value: T; setValue: (value: T) => never };
type InvariantComparisonEquals<Expected, Actual> =
InvariantComparisonEqualsWrapped<Expected> extends
InvariantComparisonEqualsWrapped<Actual>
? IsAny<Expected | Actual> extends true
? IsAny<Expected> | IsAny<Actual> extends true
? true
: false
: true
: false;
export type TypesEqual<Expected, Actual> =
InvariantComparisonEquals<Expected, Actual> extends true
? FunctionComparisonEquals<Expected, Actual>
: false;
export type TypesNotEqual<Expected, Actual> =
TypesEqual<Expected, Actual> extends true ? false : true;
这里是实际解决办法,例如使用:
export function rangeOf<U>() {
return function <T extends U[]>(...values: T) {
type Result = true extends TypesEqual<U, typeof values[number]> ? T : never;
return values as Result;
};
}
type Letters = a | b | c ;
const letters = rangeOf<Letters>()([ a , b , c ]);
type LettersTuple = typeof letters;
Some caveats: rangeOf
does not care about ordering of the tuple, and it allows duplicate entries (e.g. [ b , a , c , a ]
will satisfy rangeOf<Letters>()
). For unit tests, these issues are likely not worth caring about. However, if you do care, you can sort and de-duplicate values
before returning it. This trades a small amount of runtime performance during initialization for a "cleaner" representation.
这可能是可能的,但你必须首先按 as或 des令分类。 你们可以根据自己的需要改变特征的次序,或增加这一榜样的特质。
<斯特隆>Warning:这需要大工会的加权。
/**
* An array representing alphanumeric characters in ascending order.
* It includes uppercase letters, lowercase letters, and digits.
*/
export type AlphaNumericAscendingOrder = [
A , B , C , D , E , F , G , H , I , J ,
K , L , M , N , O , P , Q , R , S , T ,
U , V , W , X , Y , Z , a , b , c , d ,
e , f , g , h , i , j , k , l , m , n ,
o , p , q , r , s , t , u , v , w , x ,
y , z , 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ,
8 , 9
];
/**
* A type that finds the first matching substring in a given union type and returns it.
* @template Union - The union type to search within.
* @template Cache - The current cache of matching characters.
* @template Letters - The array of alphanumeric characters.
* @returns {string} The first matching substring found in the union type.
*/
export type FindMatch<Union extends string, Cache extends string = "", Letters extends string[] = AlphaNumericAscendingOrder> =
Cache extends Union
? Cache
: Letters extends [infer Letter, ...infer RemainingLetters]
? Letter extends string
? Extract<Union, `${Cache}${Letter}${string}`> extends never
? RemainingLetters extends []
? never
: FindMatch<Exclude<Union, `${Cache}${Letter}${string}`>, Cache, RemainingLetters extends string[] ? RemainingLetters : never>
: FindMatch<Extract<Union, `${Cache}${Letter}${string}`>, `${Cache}${Letter}`>
: never
: never
/**
* A type that converts a union type into a tuple by recursively finding and extracting matching substrings.
* @template Union - The union type to convert to a tuple.
* @template Tuple - The resulting tuple.
* @returns {string[]} A tuple containing all non-overlapping matching substrings from the union type.
*/
export type UnionToTuple<Union extends string, Tuple extends string[] = []> = Exclude<Union, FindMatch<Union>> extends never
? [...Tuple, Union]
: [...Tuple, FindMatch<Union>, ...UnionToTuple<Exclude<Union, FindMatch<Union>>>]
只是一种解决办法。 这很简单,但需要人工书写碎块代码。
至少,你可以肯定,贵方的物品总是为工会的每个成员拥有财产。
export type ThemeName = "default_bootstrap" | "cerulean" | "cosmo" | "cyborg"
type LazyStyleLoader = {
[key in ThemeName]: () => Promise<typeof import("*?raw")>
}
export const LazyThemeLoader: LazyStyleLoader = {
default_bootstrap: () => import("bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css?raw"),
cerulean: () => import("bootswatch/dist/cerulean/bootstrap.min.css?raw"),
cosmo: () => import("bootswatch/dist/cosmo/bootstrap.min.css?raw"),
cyborg: () => import("bootswatch/dist/cyborg/bootstrap.min.css?raw"),
};
然后,可以使用<条码>目标.keys():
const tuple = Object.keys(LazyThemeLoader);
// ["default_bootstrap", "cerulean", "cosmo", "cyborg"]
I want to convert a tuples list into a nested list using Python. How do I do that? I have a sorted list of tuples (sorted by the second value): [(1, 5), (5, 4), (13, 3), (4, 3), (3, 2), (14, 1), (...
I have python code that contains the following code. d = {} d[(0,0)] = 0 d[(1,2)] = 1 d[(2,1)] = 2 d[(2,3)] = 3 d[(3,2)] = 4 for (i,j) in d: print d[(i,j)], d[(j,i)] Unfortunately looping ...
I want to have an 3 item combination like tag, name, and list of values (array) what is the best possible data structure to store such things. Current I am using dictionary, but it only allows 2 ...
See: Can I specify a meaningful name for an anonymous class in C#? In C# you can write: var e = new { ID = 5, Name= "Prashant" }; assertEquals( 5, e.ID ) But in Scala I end up writing: var e = (5, ...
I find myself occasionally in C# 3.0 looking for ways to simulate the notion of a tuple. Over time I ve had various "poor man s" implementations, here are a few of them: Basic Object Array: object[] ...
I get the following error in diff with a red squiggle under Subset. Type mismatch. Expecting a Range -> Choice but given a Range * Range -> Choice Is there some sort of type annotation I can ...
statlist = [( abc ,5,1), ( bzs ,66,1), ... ] sorted(statlist, key=lambda x: int(x[1])) I want to sort it by the integer largest to smallest. In this case, 5 and 66. But it doesn t seem to be working.
e = ( ham , 5, 1, bird ) logfile.write( , .join(e)) I have to join it so that I can write it into a text file.