Question

It s difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.

Closed 11 years ago.

Programming Language : C

我愿把我的方案置于指挥线论点的控制之下。

我指的是,除非我进入“搁置”,否则它就应该根据我提出的论点继续执行。

Answer 1

如果我理解你的问题和评论权,你想要在休息室内检查投入,如果“放弃”你就应该退出方案(而不是休息)。

www.un.org/Depts/DGACM/index_french.htm

while (1)
{
    char input[256];

    /* Do some things here... */

    scanf("%s", input);
    if (strcmp(input, "quit") == 0)
        break;  /* exit loop */
}

Answer 2

Reading your question literally gives me this:

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    for(int i = 0; i < argc; ++i)
    {
        if(strcmp(argv[i], "quit") == 0)
            break;
        doSomething(argv[i]);
    }
}

确实不是无限的漏洞,但如果你在经过指挥线的争辩之后真正重新行事,那么无限的休息可能不是合理的。但是,我有99%的人真心想Joachim Pileberg的回答(即不使用指挥线论点,而是从标准投入流中获取投入)。

友情链接