Question

在轴心上,如果是这样的话,我们就可以重新包装安装的碎块。我记得,装设的双筒可以产生碎块。

  rpm -??? > my.rpm

以后,即,新车的平板应当使用不同的机器。

Answer 1

这样做是可能的,但与<代码>rpm的指挥无关。我写了这样做的手稿;它根据<代码>rpm - q的产出编造了一个光谱文档,并且是一份仅复制系统所安装的文档的“造纸”。

https://github.com/cormander/rogue-beret-tools/blob/master/scripts/rpm-re Pack”rel=“nofollow”

举例来说,重新包装<代码>x rpm:

证明:

$ rpm -ql mailx
/bin/mail
/etc/mail.rc
/usr/bin/Mail
/usr/lib/mail.help
/usr/lib/mail.tildehelp
/usr/share/man/man1/Mail.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/mail.1.gz

重新包装:

$ ./rpm-repack -p mailx
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9773
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note
Processing files: mailx-8.1.1-44.2.2
Provides: mailx
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rtld(GNU_HASH)
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /tmp/tlkN4yrYEi
Wrote: ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mailx-8.1.1-44.2.2.i386.rpm

证明新建成的一揽子计划:

$ rpm -qpl ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mailx-8.1.1-44.2.2.i386.rpm
/bin/mail
/etc/mail.rc
/usr/bin/Mail
/usr/lib/mail.help
/usr/lib/mail.tildehelp
/usr/share/man/man1/Mail.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/mail.1.gz

这部法典是所有的立法者,但运作正常。它的确复制了许多胎面(从rpm-qi/code>和大部分文字)但用任何手段复制。此外,它也可以复制全球公益物的签名,也不会像原始公债单一样有同样的制衡。



<>光> 这不是建造和分发输电包的“适当”方法,主要是为断肢和教育目的撰写的。

Answer 2

There is also rpmrebuild http://rpmrebuild.sourceforge.net

Answer 3

Actually there is a simple but "tricky" way; it is just : rpm -e --repackage package-name It will output the RPM in /var/spool/repackage/.

例:

# rpm -e --repackage samba3x-client
# file /var/spool/repackage/samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.i386.rpm
/var/spool/repackage/samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.i386.rpm: RPM v3 bin i386 samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7

为什么欺骗? 因为实际上remove 你们知道,该方案事先包装。

Answer 4

I think that most rpm based distributions how have official package rpmrebuild (or in the almost official 3 rd party repos like epel, rpmfusion ... etc). I think nowadays this would be your best option for repackaging installed packages.

友情链接