我在利用网络成功安装后,对CDN进行试验,我认为这是安全的家。
Why the web-role?
Well, I wanted the benefits of compression and caching headers which I was unsuccessful obtaining using normal blob way. And as an added bonus; the case-sensitive constrain was eliminated also.
<><>>> 在选择了CDN服务时;虽然以前的所有内容都来自同一领域,但现在我越来越多地使用来自cdn.cuemon.net的“静态”内容。 从理论上讲,这应当改进业绩,因为浏览器平行能够将内容收集分散到“多”领域,而只有一个领域。
不幸的是,这导致我认为在满足内容(使用追踪指挥系统)之前,必须减少霍乱的数量。
C:Windowssystem32>tracert -d cdn.cuemon.net
Tracing route to az162766.vo.msecnd.net [94.245.68.160]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 87.59.99.217
3 30 ms 30 ms 31 ms 62.95.54.124
4 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms 194.68.128.181
5 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 207.46.42.44
6 83 ms 61 ms 59 ms 207.46.42.7
7 65 ms 65 ms 64 ms 207.46.42.13
8 65 ms 67 ms 74 ms 213.199.152.186
9 65 ms 65 ms 64 ms 94.245.68.160
C:Windowssystem32>tracert cdn.cuemon.net
Tracing route to az162766.vo.msecnd.net [94.245.68.160]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 21 ms 22 ms 20 ms ge-1-1-0-1104.hlgnqu1.dk.ip.tdc.net [87.59.99.217]
3 29 ms 30 ms 30 ms ae1.tg4-peer1.sto.se.ip.tdc.net [62.95.54.124]
4 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms netnod-ix-ge-b-sth-1500.microsoft.com [194.68.128.181]
5 45 ms 45 ms 46 ms ge-3-0-0-0.ams-64cb-1a.ntwk.msn.net [207.46.42.10]
6 87 ms 59 ms 59 ms xe-3-2-0-0.fra-96cbe-1a.ntwk.msn.net [207.46.42.50]
7 68 ms 65 ms 65 ms xe-0-1-0-0.zrh-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net [207.46.42.13]
8 65 ms 70 ms 74 ms 10gigabitethernet5-1.zrh-xmx-edgcom-1b.ntwk.msn.net [213.199.152.186]
9 65 ms 65 ms 65 ms cds29.zrh9.msecn.net [94.245.68.160]
As you can see from the above trace route, all external content is delayed for quite some time. It is worth noticing, that the Azure service is setup in North Europe and I am settled in Denmark, why this trace route is a bit .. hmm .. over the top?
另一个问题might是,网络网格是另外两个小节;我没有找到时间用两个小小节进行审判,但我知道,微软将小小小节限制在5Mb/s 广域网中,那里小小小小小小小小小小小小小数是100Mb/s。
如果对裁谈会来说,我也感到不快。
任何方面——任何帮助和/或解释都受到高度赞赏。
请允许我指出,我对“空间平台”感到非常满意——我对上述问题感到非常好。
<>Update>
没有――d 选择的新痕迹。
Being inspired by user728584 I have researched and found this article, http://blogs.msdn.com/b/scicoria/archive/2011/03/11/taking-advantage-of-windows-azure-cdn-and-dynamic-pages-in-asp-net-caching-content-from-hosted-services.aspx, which I will investigate further in regards to public cache-control and CDN.
这并不能解释过度的ho积现象,但我希望有技能的网络专业人员能够帮助了解这一问题。
请放心,我将根据我的调查结果随时向你公布。