Question

我愿在<密码>IKImage EditPanel上签字,但不能在上翻一番。因此,我也这样做。

- (IBAction)imageProperties:(id)sender  { 
    IKImageEditPanel *editor = [IKImageEditPanel sharedImageEditPanel];
    [editor setFrameOrigin:NSMakePoint(400,200)];
    [editor setDataSource:self]; // I have set the DataSource.
    [editor makeKeyAndOrderFront:nil];
}

这是我的资料来源。

- (CGImageRef)image {   
    return imageView.image;    // imageView is my IKImageView
}


- (void)setImage: (CGImageRef)image imageProperties: (NSDictionary *)metaData {
    [imageView setImage:image imageProperties:metaData];
}

这一工作是正确的,但与违约的<代码>IKImageEditPanel相比,这项工作非常缓慢。 (用两倍Click表示)。查阅<代码>的正确方式是什么。 IKImageEditPanel?

Answer 1

仅删除这一方法的数据来源方法和Invoke 。

- (IBAction)editPanel:(id)sender {
    IKImageEditPanel *editor = [IKImageEditPanel sharedImageEditPanel];
    [editor setFrameOrigin:NSMakePoint(400,200)];
    [editor setDataSource:imageView]; // Here imageView is your IKImageView.
    [editor makeKeyAndOrderFront:nil];
}

I don t how this working, but it is. This got approved in the Appstore, too. So you can use this method.

友情链接