I would offer this alternative to what everyone else has posted.

System.Reflection.PropertyInfo prop = typeof(YourType).GetProperty("PropertyName");

query = query.OrderBy(x => prop.GetValue(x, null));

This avoids repeated calls to the reflection API for obtaining the property. Now the only repeated call is obtaining the value.

However

I would advocate using a PropertyDescriptor instead, as this will allow for custom TypeDescriptors to be assigned to your type, making it possible to have lightweight operations for retrieving properties and values. In the absence of a custom descriptor it will fall back to reflection anyhow.

PropertyDescriptor prop = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(typeof(YourType)).Find("PropertyName");

query = query.OrderBy(x => prop.GetValue(x));

As for speeding it up, check out Marc Gravel s HyperDescriptor project on CodeProject. I ve used this with great success; it s a life saver for high-performance data binding and dynamic property operations on business objects.

I m a little late to the party, however, I hope this can be of some help.

The problem with using reflection is that the resulting Expression Tree will almost certainly not be supported by any Linq providers other than the internal .Net provider. This is fine for internal collections, however this will not work where the sorting is to be done at source (be that SQL, MongoDb, etc.) prior to pagination.

The code sample below provides IQueryable extention methods for OrderBy and OrderByDescending, and can be used like so:

query = query.OrderBy("ProductId");

Extension Method:

public static class IQueryableExtensions 
{
    public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string propertyName)
    {
        return source.OrderBy(ToLambda<T>(propertyName));
    }

    public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderByDescending<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string propertyName)
    {
        return source.OrderByDescending(ToLambda<T>(propertyName));
    }

    private static Expression<Func<T, object>> ToLambda<T>(string propertyName)
    {
        var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T));
        var property = Expression.Property(parameter, propertyName);
        var propAsObject = Expression.Convert(property, typeof(object));

        return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, object>>(propAsObject, parameter);            
    }
}

Regards, Mark.

I liked the answer from @Mark Powell, but as @ShuberFu said, it gives the error LINQ to Entities only supports casting EDM primitive or enumeration types.

Removing var propAsObject = Expression.Convert(property, typeof(object)); didn t work with properties that were value types, such as integer, as it wouldn t implicitly box the int to object.

Using Ideas from Kristofer Andersson and Marc Gravell I found a way to construct the Queryable function using the property name and have it still work with Entity Framework. I also included an optional IComparer parameter. Caution: The IComparer parameter does not work with Entity Framework and should be left out if using Linq to Sql.

The following works with Entity Framework and Linq to Sql:

query = query.OrderBy("ProductId");

And @Simon Scheurer this also works:

query = query.OrderBy("ProductCategory.CategoryId");

And if you are not using Entity Framework or Linq to Sql, this works:

query = query.OrderBy("ProductCategory", comparer);

Here is the code:

public static class IQueryableExtensions 
{    
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> query, string propertyName, IComparer<object> comparer = null)
{
    return CallOrderedQueryable(query, "OrderBy", propertyName, comparer);
}

public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderByDescending<T>(this IQueryable<T> query, string propertyName, IComparer<object> comparer = null)
{
    return CallOrderedQueryable(query, "OrderByDescending", propertyName, comparer);
}

public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenBy<T>(this IOrderedQueryable<T> query, string propertyName, IComparer<object> comparer = null)
{
    return CallOrderedQueryable(query, "ThenBy", propertyName, comparer);
}

public static IOrderedQueryable<T> ThenByDescending<T>(this IOrderedQueryable<T> query, string propertyName, IComparer<object> comparer = null)
{
    return CallOrderedQueryable(query, "ThenByDescending", propertyName, comparer);
}

/// <summary>
/// Builds the Queryable functions using a TSource property name.
/// </summary>
public static IOrderedQueryable<T> CallOrderedQueryable<T>(this IQueryable<T> query, string methodName, string propertyName,
        IComparer<object> comparer = null)
{
    var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "x");

    var body = propertyName.Split( . ).Aggregate<string, Expression>(param, Expression.PropertyOrField);

    return comparer != null
        ? (IOrderedQueryable<T>)query.Provider.CreateQuery(
            Expression.Call(
                typeof(Queryable),
                methodName,
                new[] { typeof(T), body.Type },
                query.Expression,
                Expression.Lambda(body, param),
                Expression.Constant(comparer)
            )
        )
        : (IOrderedQueryable<T>)query.Provider.CreateQuery(
            Expression.Call(
                typeof(Queryable),
                methodName,
                new[] { typeof(T), body.Type },
                query.Expression,
                Expression.Lambda(body, param)
            )
        );
}
}

Yes, I don t think there s another way than Reflection.

Example:

query = query.OrderBy(x => x.GetType().GetProperty("ProductId").GetValue(x, null));

query = query.OrderBy(x => x.GetType().GetProperty("ProductId").GetValue(x, null));

Trying to recall exact syntax off the top of my head but I think that is correct.

Warning ⚠️

You just can use Reflection in case that data is in-memory. Otherwise, you will see some error like below when you work with Linq-2-EF, Linq-2-SQL, etc.

@Florin Vîrdol s comment

LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method System.Object GetValue(System.Object) method and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.

Why ?

Because when you write code to provide a query to Linq query provider. It is first translated into an SQL statement and then executed on the database server.

(See image below, from https://www.tutorialsteacher.com/linq/linq-expression)

Solution ✅

By using Expression tree, you can write a generic method like this

public static IEnumerable<T> OrderDynamic<T>(IEnumerable<T> Data, string propToOrder)
{
    var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T));
    var memberAccess = Expression.Property(param, propToOrder);        
    var convertedMemberAccess = Expression.Convert(memberAccess, typeof(object));
    var orderPredicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, object>>(convertedMemberAccess, param);

    return Data.AsQueryable().OrderBy(orderPredicate).ToArray();
}

And use it like this

var result = OrderDynamic<Student>(yourQuery, "StudentName"); // string property

or

var result = OrderDynamic<Student>(yourQuery, "Age");  // int property

And it s also working with in-memory by converting your data into IQueryable<TElement> in your generic method return statement like this

return Data.AsQueryable().OrderBy(orderPredicate).ToArray();

See the image below to know more in-depth.

Demo on dotnetfiddle

More productive than reflection extension to dynamic order items:

public static class DynamicExtentions
{
    public static object GetPropertyDynamic<Tobj>(this Tobj self, string propertyName) where Tobj : class
    {
        var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Tobj), "value");
        var getter = Expression.Property(param, propertyName);
        var boxer = Expression.TypeAs(getter, typeof(object));
        var getPropValue = Expression.Lambda<Func<Tobj, object>>(boxer, param).Compile();            
        return getPropValue(self);
    }
}

Example:

var ordered = items.OrderBy(x => x.GetPropertyDynamic("ProductId"));

Also you may need to cache complied lambas(e.g. in Dictionary<>)

Reflection is the answer!

typeof(YourType).GetProperty("ProductId").GetValue(theInstance);

There s lots of things you can do to cache the reflected PropertyInfo, check for bad strings, write your query comparison function, etc., but at its heart, this is what you do.

Also Dynamic Expressions can solve this problem. You can use string-based queries through LINQ expressions that could have been dynamically constructed at run-time.

var query = query
          .Where("Category.CategoryName == @0 and Orders.Count >= @1", "Book", 10)
          .OrderBy("ProductId")
          .Select("new(ProductName as Name, Price)");

I think we can use a powerful tool name Expression an in this case use it as an extension method as follows:

public static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string ordering, bool descending)
{
    var type = typeof(T);
    var property = type.GetProperty(ordering);
    var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
    var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
    var orderByExp = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
    MethodCallExpression resultExp = 
        Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), (descending ? "OrderByDescending" : "OrderBy"), 
            new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType }, source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExp));
    return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(resultExp);
}