Question

This is a bit more of a fun question than a serious one, but how does the Adobe PDF format make documents so... portable?

I just created a small Word document, 235kb in size, containing multiple color photos and a few textual phrases. A PDF created using CutePDF (which I understand isn t the most efficient method of PDF creation) is only 176kb. That s a 25% compression ratio. When those files are placed into a compressed folder, the PDF is capable of 3% compression where the .docx can only take 2%. I m sure that larger files would have even greater differences in size.

My question is, how does Adobe manage to make their files so much smaller? I understand that they are drawn from raster graphics, but my 3 bitmap files really can t be helped from raster that much, can they?

Answer 1

If you have Acrobat 9 there is a nice tool built-in so you can see how the PDF was put together (and compressions used). There is a blog post explaining how to use it at http://pdf.jpedal.org/java-pdf-blog/bid/10479/Viewing-PDF-objects

Answer 2

There are a few ways it can be compressing this:

Pdf files use lzw and zip compression.
If the image is scaled in the document, or is a larger dpi on disk than you allow for in cutepdf (for example, if cutepdf is set for 300dpi and the image is 600 dpi), it can be scaled in the pdf.
Microsoft stores TONS of info in the docx format, in xml. WAY more than is really needed to just export the info (for an example, try copying and pasting your text into a textbox cell, and look at the html info that comes out - I had a limit on a textbox size for a cms, and a 7 word sentence ballooned to 950 characters). This is so it can be later edited, and with a lot of esoteric info to make sure everything displays right in every possible permutation. The pdf doesn t need that info, and so it can just do the font and size, and strip out all the unnecessary info, saving a ton of space.

Answer 3

When you use such small files any overhead in the document format will have a disproportionate effect which is why you are seeing such large % differences.

I took a 2683KB JPEG and inserted it into a new word 2003 document. The resulting .doc file was 2725KB (or 2697KB as docx). Turning this into a PDF gives me a 2701KB PDF. So I am seeing a difference of 25KB, but only about 1% difference because of the size of the image data. It is about half what you got but maybe the version of word you have is more verbose when making docx?

For the PDF, acrobat shows space usage as 2691K image, 8.27K overhead and 1K fonts. PDF is quite a sparse format in its syntax which limits overhead and much of it has repeating strings so is easily compressible.

If you want to see what the PDF contains in a tree-like view you can download the demo version of CosEdit.

友情链接