Can it be defined in .h and .cpp file or it has to be defined in a single .h file?
You can define in just a .h or split the class definitions just as you would for traditional C++.
Note that for properties you will need to nest your get and set methods with proper scoping, eg:
void MyModel::AProperty::set(bool b)
{
mBackingVariableForAProperty = b;
}
I m a bit rusty, actually really rusty with my C++. Haven t touched it since Freshman year of college so it s been a while. Anyway, I m doing the reverse of what most people do. Calling C# code ...
Can it be defined in .h and .cpp file or it has to be defined in a single .h file?
I suppose you cannot simply compile a C++ application with a C++/CLI compiler. I am wondering if it would be difficult. Has anybody tried this, and if so: were there a lot of modifications needed?
I recently stumbled upon Code Contracts and have started using them in my C# projects. However, I also have a number of projects written in C++/CLI. For C# and VB, Code Contracts offer a handy ...
I am creating a wrapper around a native lib, which comes in both 32 & 64 bit flavors. I have a fairly complex C++/CLR project that includes a number of header files from the native libs. I got it ...
I have a non-.NET C++ class as follows: Foo.h: namespace foo { const static std::string FOO; ... } Foo.cc: using namespace foo; const std::string FOO = "foo"; I want to expose this for use ...
I have a .NET assembly. It happens to be written in C++/CLI. I am exposing a few objects via COM. Everything is working fine, but I cannot for the life of me figure out how to return an array of my ...
When I m trying serialize a class containing this property: [NonSerialized] property System::Collections::ObjectModel::ReadOnlyCollection<String^>^ IgnoredWords I get a compilation error ...