Question

我的大麻知道高级文字编辑的想法,如强调文字、完成编码、自动登革等。

表达我的想法我想,强调案文正读到整个案文中,然后用关键词+颜色代码定期替换关键词,并再次取代案文。这看起来是合乎逻辑的,但是,如果你的文件是4 000条线,那么在每一个关键线上都这样做,就会如此低效。因此,我知道在C#中执行此类事情的想法(任何其他语言也将被罚款,但现在我正在尝试什么)。

Answer 1

Syntax highlighting: This comes to mind. I haven t actually tried the example, so I cannot say anything about the performance, but it seems to be the simplest way of getting basic syntax highlighting up and running.

Auto-completion: Given a list of possible keywords (that could be filtered based on context) you could quickly discard anything that doesn t match what the user is currently typing. In most languages, you can safely limit yourself to one "word", since whitespace isn t usually legal in an identifier. For example, if I start typing "li", the auto-completion database can discard anything that doesn t start with the letters l and i (ignoring case). As the user continues to type, more and more options can be discarded until only one -- or at least a few -- remains. Since you re just looking at one word at a time, this would be very fast indeed.

Indentation: A quick-and-dirty approach that would (kind of) work in C-like languages is to have a counter that you increment once for every { , and decrement once for every } . When you hit enter to start a new line, the indentation level is then counter * indentWidth, where indentWidth is a constant number of spaces or tabs to indent by. This suffers from a serious drawback, though -- consider the following:

if(foo)
    bar(); // This line should be indented, but how does the computer know?

为了解决这一问题,你可能会看一线,而不是分界。

Answer 2

http://www.finseth.com/craft/rel=“nofollow” 第7章直接涉及重新展示战略的问题。

Answer 3

为了“先进”强调——即强调需要了解情况——往往需要教区。 http://en.wikipedia.org/wi,存在于各种品种中:,

然而,大多数教职员工在全文档案中运作,在文字编辑方面相当低,因此,我们转而到 incremental parsers 。增派教职人员利用对以前处理过的语文和结构的了解,以便尽可能少地重新开展工作。

此处略加提及增量平价:

友情链接