Question

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.

这个问题似乎并不涉及在help Center中界定的范围之内的方案规划。

Closed 8 years ago.

Improve this question

我的申请已经达到极佳的字塔/甲型,我可能在某个时候公布。我没有决定在我的申请中使用什么软件许可证。申请正在施工之中。我必须提出一个问题,每个发展者在某个时候思考这个问题。

我的软件更像是一个图书馆,这里是我的一些关键因素:

It must be an open-source license.
It must be free for developers to use as a library for their applications.
Developers are allowed to redistribute the source code as part of their applications modified or unmodified.
The library can be used for closed-source software.
I want attribution/credit. A one-line credit in the software Help dialog or somewhere in about section of their website is fine. As long as it is reasonable easy for a 3rd-party to find out what library was used to produce the resulting software.
Forking a new project out of my existing source code should not be allowed. I want people to be able to use it and even modify it, but not clone a new similar product to compete against my existing product.
The license needs to state that I take no responsibility for any damage whatsoever.

是否有这样的许可证? 这些要求是否甚至符合开放源许可证?

Answer 1

不应允许在我现有的源代码之外开展新的项目。

最重要的是与公开来源概念(允许/鼓励引诱)相抵触。更多引文如下: 哪些开放源许可证没有

如果你认为你可以放弃这一要求,最好的选择是LGPL,以及要求人们必须给予你的信贷的额外要求(你必须界定你想要的不同用途的归属/信誉)。

正如James在先前的评论中指出的那样:

很少见

It is very hard to fork a (big) project
You can benefit more if there are forks - you can take the good ideas from the fork and leave the bad. That way the better judgement about features/code will eventually win (which is part of the idea of Open Source)

Answer 2

Forking a new project out of my existing source code should not be allowed. I want people to be able to use it and even modify it, but not clone a new similar product to compete against my existing product.

首脑会议我从未在公开来源许可中听到过这种说法,我不知道有任何这样的情况。你们怎么会说? 确定一个 for子和另一个拿走过你的手法,然后又加上一个patch子之间的区别,确实是困难的。

你们能否考虑这一点? 很少见到,当他们这样做时,总是没有竞争。人才、思想甚至法典可以自由传承。

Answer 3

你需要与律师交谈,我们是律师,没有了解你的申请。

正如詹姆斯所说,防止使用公开来源许可证是复杂的。

在商业应用方面,您不妨研究双重许可。

就我所知,LGPL允许假肢。

Answer 4

你们应该能够找到适合你们需要的人:

更具体地说,我认为万国邮联的公证员可能满足贵图书馆的需要。考虑到(所有)开放源许可证,LGPL允许开户。

友情链接