I ve just been chatting with a Microsoft MVP, and he told me that MSMQ is obsolete. Is this true? What s the infrastructure for SOA then???
Well, they released a new version (4.0) with Vista, and it s an explicitly available channel in WCF, out of the box, so I d say no.
I ve built new services based on it in the last six months, and there s no official MS documentation I m aware of that says it s going away.
If you need reliable messaging, there aren t many good options. If you re already deep in database land, Service Broker may make sense, but otherwise... MSMQ
I don t think it s obsolete at all. Do a google search for MSMQ and WCF - you ll get lots of results.
Here is a good article:
Any SOA Architecture (n-tier) Real-World Samples with .NET for getting started ?
I am trying to separate behaviour from data completely in my classes and came up with this simple solution: class ClassAData { public int Property1; public string Property2; public bool ...
What management tools (open source or otherwise) are there to track the location of data, the services that deliver/use that data and the services themselves. If you believe the snake oil a ...
I ve just been chatting with a Microsoft MVP, and he told me that MSMQ is obsolete. Is this true? What s the infrastructure for SOA then???
I frequently hear Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) being tossed around as a buzzword among non-technical customers or program managers with little concern or understanding for what it actually ...
I am moving onto a new team that has implemented a solution using SOA with WCF. The services are all very vertical, for example: a CustomerService, an AddressService, an AccountService, etc. To ...
I have an e-commerce website that is already up and running for some time. It s built on .NET 3.5. So far, so good. The "problem" is that now I need to start sharing functionality (products list, ...
I have a windows application that has its business logic layer implemented as a WCF service. This service is currently hosted on IIS. I wanted to know that if there s a way where I could optionally ...
