English 中文(简体)
Geronimo vs Glassfish
原标题:

For a production environment, is Apache Geronimo better for applications that uses ActiveMQ, Derby, Solr?

问题回答

In short if you want a lightweight deployment container use Geronimo (it s based on Apache and Jetty). If you want an "all in one do everything for you JEE5 container" then Glassfish is the way to go, but it s no small thing.

Finally, question why you want to have a container at all. What is it that you need to do that really needs a full on container? A lot of highly scalable solutions use a mixture of Spring and Jetty to achieve their aims. Very light, very agile.

All applications and hardware is different. So even if you find a comparison it doesn t really mean much. What you ultimately need to do is do your own load testing, on hardware that is the same or very similar to Production.

You can use http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ or something like that to produce the load.





相关问题
Geronimo vs Glassfish

For a production environment, is Apache Geronimo better for applications that uses ActiveMQ, Derby, Solr?

Anyone using multicast with ActiveMQ

I m having trouble setting up multicast transport using ActiveMQ. I noticed with version 5.2 there is a bug that prevents it from even building the correct factory (fixed in 5.3). The fact this bug ...

How to optimize activemq

I m using ActiveMQ on a simulation of overloading servers in Java. And mainly it goes ok, but when I get over 600 requests the thing just go WTF! I think the bottleneck is my Master Server which is ...

ActiveMQ Consumer / Producer Connection Listener

I can t seem to find a way to listen for new producer and consumer connections (or connection interrupts) in ActiveMQ (Java Version). I want to be able to tell the consumers (or they can find out ...

热门标签